Southeast Asia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Southeast Asia - Essay ExampleTherefore, Southeast Asia stands as typical case for examining the military posture of the theoretical models of democratic transition. In addition, the ethnically diverse countries of Southeast Asia are noted for their rapid economic development and corresponding semipolitical upheavals. In acknowledging the possibility of sustainable alternative regimes to democracy, this literature appears to significantly divide from modernization theoryslinear conception of political development that was implicit in earlier transition theory. further how adept is this work in explaining, as opposed to characterizing, regimes that dont seem to conform to prevailing ideal types of shogunate or democracy What light can it shed on the particular paradox mentioned above And on the dot how far has it shifted from the primary assumptions of modernization theory In part this is due to the persistent preoccupation with intellect how to achieve democratic transition. This tends to steer analysis away from a full understanding of the forces behind disparate regime directions in favor of prescriptions to correct democratic institutional deficiencies. A related problem is the press framework within which analysis is conducted, whereby institutions loom large but their relationships to wider billet structures are either unheeded or under-theorized. For this reason, much of the debate about preferred institutional design to promote or remediate democracy within this literature may be informed by idealist, liberal optimism rather than a realistic assessment of the foundations and dynamics of regime power. This is not to deny attempts have been made to incorporate socio-economic and structural factors into analysis, but these have not been linked to any wider analysis of capitalist development and its implications for the exercise of power and related conflicts.Revisiting the Theories of Democratic Transition There are many contesting theoretical perspectives which attempt to explain the intricacies of political transition. It has been generally observed that theories of democratic transition are not really successful in explaining the move of political development in the postcolonial societies. However, the relationship between economic development and political transition against the experiences of terce world countries could be explained using the existing theoretical frameworks of democratic transition with adequate alterations and modifications. Both Marxist and Weberian approaches are useful for this purpose as the modern effort to relate changes in political regimes to changes in the underlying economic structures takes off largely from the grand theorizing of late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, curiously that done by Karl Marx and Max Weber (Crouch and Morley, 1993, p. 313). It does not mean that both Marxist and Weberian schools of thought are equally useful in all the social contexts. Generally spea king, Marxist theories are more utile for analyzing the cases of developing countries which are locked in the mirage of war and imperialism. On the other hand, Weberian theories are commonly used for analyzing the political process of advanced industrial societies of the west as liberal democracy attained almost churchman status in the West vis--vis the development of communism in the east. Lipset was a pioneering figure in livery in the ideas of Weber for the analysis